Analysis of the factors associated with survival to hospital discharge in adult patients with cardiac arrest in the emergency department

Objective@#There is limited data on the outcomes of cardiac arrest occurring in emergency departments (ED). The objective of this study was to identify the factors associated with these outcomes, primarily the survival to hospital discharge and the neurological status at discharge in emergency department cardiac arrest (EDCA) patients. @*Methods@#A retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary hospital. Adult patients aged over 18 years who had suffered an in-hospital cardiac arrest in the ED between July 2018 to June 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the survival to hospital discharge. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression analyses were performed. @*Results@#We identified 157 ED arrests. Among these, 57.9% of the patients died in the emergency room. A total of 24.1% obtained survival discharge. The combined existing illnesses, such as renal insufficiency or malignancy were directly related to the survival of the patients. A cardiac and respiratory cause of arrest increased the probability of survival (P<0.001). The shorter the time spent on cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), the higher the chances of survival (odds ratio of 0.84). The subjects in both the survivor and deceased groups were classified as Korean Triage and Acuity Scale 2 (KTAS 2: emergency) or higher (P=0.719). There was no difference in the ED occupancy, which is an emergency room overcrowding indicator. @*Conclusion@#EDCA patients are already in a clinically deteriorated condition. The underlying clinical conditions, the cause of cardiac arrest, the initial rhythm, and the CPR duration time are directly related to the patient’s chances of survival and prognoses. Therefore, it is possible to identify these factors at an early stage and take the appropriate management measures.

Characteristics of patients transferred from long-term care hospital to emergency department

Objective@#This study was undertaken to assess the appropriateness of transfer of patients from a long-term care hospital to the emergency department (ED). @*Methods@#We conducted a retrospective study in a Wide Regional Emergency Center in Gyeongsangnam-do between January 2019 and December 2019. The patients were divided into groups (direct visit, transferred from other hospitals, and transferred from long-term care hospitals [LTCHs]). The baseline characteristics, Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS), vital signs, length of stay, ED disposition, cost, clinical outcome, and instances of application of the “Act on decisions on life-sustaining treatment” were collected. @*Results@#A total of 30,142 patients were enrolled during the study period. Twenty-one thousand, nine hundred and sixty-five patients were in the direct visit group, 7,057 patients were transferred from other hospitals, and 1,120 patients were transferred from LTCHs. Hospital admission was higher in cases of transfer from other hospitals and LTCHs (LTCHs, 63.8%; transferred from other hospitals, 64.1%, direct visit, 30.1%; P<0.001). Re-transfer and mortality in the ED were much higher (re-transfer: LTCHs, 11.0%; transferred from other hospitals 3.8%, direct visit 1.9%; P<0.001 and mortality in ED: 2.9%, 0.8%, 1.4%; respectively P<0.001). In the LCTH group after admission, mortality was higher (mortality: 16.2%, 5.4%, 7.1% for LTCH transfers and direct respectively; P<0.001). The implementation rate of the “Act on decisions on life-sustaining treatment”, the well-dying law, was higher in the LTCHs (26.6%, 12.5%, and 11.4% LTCH transfers, and direct respectively; P<0.001). @*Conclusion@#In the LTCH group, re-transfer, mortality, and the implementation rate of the “Act on decisions on life-sustaining treatment” were higher than in the other groups.

Appropriateness of Korean Triage and Acuity Scale-based triage system for dizziness without neurologic symptoms

Objective@#This study aimed to identify the appropriateness of the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS) for dizziness without neurological symptoms, which was level 3. @*Methods@#Using the registry of the National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS), data regarding consecutive emergency patients from January 2016 to July 2018, who were aged 15 years and older, were reviewed retrospectively. The data were classified using KTAS and Dizziness KTAS level 3 were compared with non-dizziness KTAS level 3 including age, total admission rate, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rate, discharge rate, hospital cost, and length of stay in the emergency department (length of stay [LOS]). @*Results@#Of the 76,153 emergency patients, 345 (0.5%) had a KTAS level 1, 4,593 (6.0%) had a KTAS level 2, 21,561 (28.3%) had a KTAS level 3, 45,390 (59.6%) had a KTAS level 4, and 4,264 (5.6%) had a KTAS level 5. As the patient’s triage score decreased, the total admission rate, ICU admission rate, hospital cost, and LOS decreased. Patients discharged to home also had the same result. Dizziness KTAS level 3 had a significantly lower rate of total admission (23% vs. 56.2%, P<0.001) and ICU admission (0.9% vs. 6.2%, P<0.001) compared with non-dizziness KTAS level 3. On the other hand, the hospital cost and LOS were higher when patients were discharged to their home. The predictors of the admission rate of dizziness KTAS level 3 were the transportation method using a private ambulance service and older age, but older age was only slightly associated. @*Conclusion@#This study showed that KTAS level 3 for dizziness needs to be adjusted because of lower severity than other level 3. Old age and the transportation method should be considered factors.

The influence of symptom to balloon time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

OBJECTIVE@#The current guidelines for the treatment of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) recommends early reperfusion with a door to balloon (DTB) time of 90 minutes or less in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Therefore, the focus of most studies has been the DTB time. On the other hand, the ischemic time is related to the symptom to balloon (STB) time rather than the DTB time. This study examined the clinical effects of the STB time as well as the social and clinical factors affecting the STB time in STEMI patients.@*METHODS@#This study analyzed 286 patients diagnosed with STEMI from December 2008 to December 2016. The STB time (≤4 hours and>4 hours, ≤12 hours, and >12 hours) in the groups was compared. The mortality and ejection fraction were investigated. In addition, the characteristics of patients and socioeconomic factors affecting STB were analyzed.@*RESULTS@#The SBT time is inversely associated with the ejection fraction (R=−0.126, P=0.033), and the ejection fraction of the ≤12 hours group was higher than that of the >12 hours group (54% vs. 50%, P=0.047). On the other hand, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (3.26% vs. 4.84%, P=0.506). In multivariate analysis, the variable related to SBT was only typical chest pain (adjusted odd ratio, 1.931; 95% confidential interval, 1.014-3.792; P=0.045).@*CONCLUSION@#The results of the study support the prognostic value of SBT in STEMI undergoing PPCI. Therefore, efforts should be made to shorten the STB time.

Impact of interhospital transfer on outcomes for trauma patients: impact of direct versus non-direct transfer

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the prognosis of patients who visited the trauma center directly (direct visit group) with those transferred from the non-trauma center (transferred group). METHODS: The patients, who were 18 or older with Injury Severity Score of 15 or more in the trauma center at Busan, were studied from October 2015 to October 2016. To compare the treatment time between the direct visit and transferred group, first treatment time, final treatment time, and time to visit the trauma center were examined. To compare the prognosis, this study compared the 48-hour, 7-day, and in-hospital mortality rate as well as the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) and total hospital stay. To analyze the factors affecting the outcome of transferred group, the physician's level and procedures that had been performed at the non-trauma center were examined. RESULTS: The mortality was similar in the direct visit and transferred group (48-hour 7.6% vs. 4.6%, P=0.111; 7-day 11.1% vs. 7.2%, P=0.89; and in-hospital 14.6% vs. 11.3%, P=0.214). The length of ICU and total hospital stay were similar in the two groups. The mortality was higher in the patients in the transferred group when using intubation, transfusion, and pressure intensifier. The intubated patients showed higher mortality according to logistic regression. CONCLUSION: The mortality, length of ICU, and hospital stay were similar but the time to visit the trauma center and the final treatment time were longer in transferred group. Stabilizing the patient at the near non-trauma center may be more helpful for some patients.

The Analysis about Tendency of Emergency Medicine in Pain Control

PURPOSE: Inadequate treatment of pain, which has been termed as “oligoanalgesia”, appears to be common phenomenon the emergency department (ED). In order to improve pain recognition and management, a study concerning physician characteristics on pain and pain management is needed. METHODS: This study was based on a survey that targeted emergency medicine doctors from September to November 2015 (the response rate was 7%). Firstly, the survey showed that physicians preferred medicating on five diseases abdominal pain, cancer, simple musculoskeletal disease, trauma, headache in the ED. Secondly, it demonstrated the criteria used to choose the analgesic treatment in accordance with each disease and the level of pain, which is determined using a numerical rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: In the cases of abdominal pain that requires surgery, cancer pain, and multiple trauma, physicians preferred using an opioid as the first medication, while non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are prescribed in most of the other cases. Meperidine was the preferred choice as the opioid. For almost diseases, the NSAIDs are selected in the lower NRS cases over the opioid. Physicians deal with pain of patients who are already diagnosed with specific diseases, such as cancer, while they avoid managing pain from those patients who have not been definitively diagnosed with a specific disease. CONCLUSION: Physicians in the ED prefer the use of NSAIDs as the analgesic treatment, in particular, prescribing meperidine as the preferred opioid. However, it seems that they are hesitant to manage pain without a clear diagnosis.